This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential to the operation of the site, while others help to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. For more information, please see the ProZ.com privacy policy.
Cookie settings
  1. KudoZ™ Top
  2. English to Polish
  3. Law: Patents, Trademarks, Copyright

KudoZ question not available

Polish translation: (z lub bez) sprzeciwu wobec wezwania do wydzielenia zgłoszeń patentowych

GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW)
English term or phrase:(with or without) traverse
Polish translation:(z lub bez) sprzeciwu wobec wezwania do wydzielenia zgłoszeń patentowych
Entered by: mike23

13:00 Jan 7, 2016
English to Polish translations [PRO]
Law/Patents - Law: Patents, Trademarks, Copyright / zastrzeżenia patentowe
English term or phrase: (with or without) traverse
Wg amerykańskiego CFR (Code of Federal Regulations):

"The election of an invention or species may be made with or without traverse. To preserve a right to petition, the election must be made with traverse. If the reply (to the action of the US Patent and Trademark Office) does not distinctly and specifically point out supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election shall be treated as an election without traverse. Traversal must be presented at the time of election to be considered timely. Failure to timely traverse the requirement will result in the loss of right to petition under 37 CFR 1.144"
KaHa
Local time: 13:18
(z lub bez) sprzeciwu wobec wezwania do wydzielenia zgłoszeń patentowych
Explanation:
z lub bez sprzeciwu wobec wezwania do (ograniczenia zakresu zastrzeżeń patentowych lub) wydzielenia zgłoszeń patentowych

http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s818.html

Więcej w dyskusji

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day19 hrs (2016-01-09 08:01:31 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

When two or more independent and distinct inventions are presented for examination, the examiner may make a restriction requirement if a serious burden exists. In the reply to the restriction requirement, applicant must elect one invention for examination. If applicant wishes to traverse the restriction requirement, the reply must also include a traversal with specific reasons why applicant believes the restriction requirement is in error.
...
Election in reply to a requirement for restriction may be made either with or without an accompanying traverse of the requirement. A complete reply to a restriction requirement must include an election even if applicant traverses the requirement.

A traverse is a request for reconsideration of a requirement to restrict that must include a written statement of the reasons for traverse, distinctly and specifically pointing out the supposed errors upon which the applicant relies for his or her conclusion that the requirement is in error. The absence of any statement indicating whether the requirement to restrict is traversed or the failure to provide reasons for traverse will be treated as an election without traverse.
Selected response from:

mike23
Poland
Local time: 13:18
Grading comment
Dziękuję, wykorzystałam tę wersję
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer



Summary of answers provided
2(z lub bez) sprzeciwu wobec wezwania do wydzielenia zgłoszeń patentowych
mike23


Discussion entries: 3





  

Answers


1 day 18 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 2/5Answerer confidence 2/5
(z lub bez) sprzeciwu wobec wezwania do wydzielenia zgłoszeń patentowych


Explanation:
z lub bez sprzeciwu wobec wezwania do (ograniczenia zakresu zastrzeżeń patentowych lub) wydzielenia zgłoszeń patentowych

http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s818.html

Więcej w dyskusji

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day19 hrs (2016-01-09 08:01:31 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

When two or more independent and distinct inventions are presented for examination, the examiner may make a restriction requirement if a serious burden exists. In the reply to the restriction requirement, applicant must elect one invention for examination. If applicant wishes to traverse the restriction requirement, the reply must also include a traversal with specific reasons why applicant believes the restriction requirement is in error.
...
Election in reply to a requirement for restriction may be made either with or without an accompanying traverse of the requirement. A complete reply to a restriction requirement must include an election even if applicant traverses the requirement.

A traverse is a request for reconsideration of a requirement to restrict that must include a written statement of the reasons for traverse, distinctly and specifically pointing out the supposed errors upon which the applicant relies for his or her conclusion that the requirement is in error. The absence of any statement indicating whether the requirement to restrict is traversed or the failure to provide reasons for traverse will be treated as an election without traverse.

mike23
Poland
Local time: 13:18
Works in field
Native speaker of: Native in PolishPolish
PRO pts in category: 56
Grading comment
Dziękuję, wykorzystałam tę wersję
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)



Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.

You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.

Return to KudoZ list

KudoZ™ translation help

The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.

See also:
ProZ.com term search
Search millions of term translations
Close search
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search