GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
10:32 Mar 22, 2022 |
Swedish to English translations [PRO] Tech/Engineering - Engineering: Industrial / tunneling | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Deane Goltermann Sweden Local time: 13:18 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +3 | (tunneling) progress vs (blast) round length |
| ||
5 | advance per round |
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
Assessment of Rock Mass Quality and its Effects on Chargeability |
|
Discussion entries: 3 | |
---|---|
advance per round Explanation: Referring to the "Bergteknisk Ordlista" issued by TNC, I find that "indrift" is "advance per round". I presume they are talking about blasting rounds when using explosives to tunnel into hard rock. "Framdrift" is given by the same source as "advance" in a more general sense. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
(tunneling) progress vs (blast) round length Explanation: In more than 2 million words with tunneling tender documents, this is what I have used. Using 'progress' covers more situations and contexts, but is less technical. Blast round length is used much less often and is more specific. Each blast round involves several holes of equal length, but that length varies based on the rock quality you are working with. Here's some reading. Example sentence(s):
|
| |
Grading comment
| ||