The desubstantialization of money via its digization, combined with the decapitalization of the economy, has resulted in a situation where the operative economy is closer to feudalism than to capitalism proper, based as it is primarily on property as real estate.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/kalountos.wordpress.com/2015/07...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day 15 hrs (2020-10-15 08:28:58 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

To put it another way: the desubstantialization of money itself has become a reality. From the superficial point of view of bourgeois economic theory—which never managed to understand the allegedly “philosophical” implications of the economic concept of value and which had long restricted itself, on the practical plane, to producing techniques of financial manipulation or formulating, on the theoretical plane, Platonic mathematical models—this was, naturally, no catastrophe. Thus, after Keynes, everyone was compelled to assert that gold was only a “barbarous metal”, without any contemporary monetary significance. No one, of course, asked whether monetary social mediation and the fetishistic self-movement of “value” were not themselves barbarous primitivisms and ultimately not unlike the “barbarous metal” in that regard. The desubstantialization of money signifies nothing less than its effective devalorization, and thus the loss of an essential function of money: that of being the means of storing value.
https://libcom.org/library/apotheosis-money-structural-limit...