Aug 11, 2021 10:33
2 yrs ago
21 viewers *
English term
France
Specialized in Health, webmarking, tech
Native in: French (Variants: Belgian, Standard-France, Canadian, Swiss)
Works in: English to French, Danish to French
Reruns
English to French
Science
Meteorology
Reruns
Bonjour, j'ai un doute sur le sens du terme "rerun" ici : "The delegation was interested in the coupling with hydrology and asked if the Centre had been able to make some reruns of flood events in the last couple of years. The Director of Forecasts confirmed that the Centre did make reruns."
Est ce qu'il s'agit de reproduction d'évènement ? Je ne pense pas qu'il s'agisse de rediffusion.
Merci !
Est ce qu'il s'agit de reproduction d'évènement ? Je ne pense pas qu'il s'agisse de rediffusion.
Merci !
Proposed translations
(French)
Proposed translations
+1
6 hrs
Selected
refaire tourner la simulation
Expression qu'on trouve tout à fait, comme :
"faire tourner"
... ce modèle doit être défini à partir de lois d’évolution. En le faisant « tourner » on simule alors le comportement du système à différentes échéances à partir d’un état initial préalablement définit.
https://www.meteocontact.fr/pour-aller-plus-loin/les-modeles...
"refaire tourner"
... Estimation des incertitudes et possibilité de refaire tourner le modèle en perturbant les conditions initiales dans les zones sensibles pour
la situation considérée...
https://www.umr-cnrm.fr/IMG/pdf/game_valorisation_v2.pdf
ainsi que dans
... il n ́était pas possible pour les impacteurs de reformuler
leurs modèles pour mieux tenir compte des limites et des caracté́ristiques des sorties des MCGs ou pour les climatologues de refaire tourner les simulations de changement climatique...
http://www.gip-ecofor.org/doc/drupal/gicc/1-00PolcherRF.pdf
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 10 Tage (2021-08-22 09:06:22 GMT) Post-grading
--------------------------------------------------
Bonjour Séverine. Merci d'avoir choisi cette réponse. Puis-je savoir la raison pourquoi vous lui accordez 2 points sur 4 seulement ? Y avait-il des éléments qui vous ont manqué...?
"faire tourner"
... ce modèle doit être défini à partir de lois d’évolution. En le faisant « tourner » on simule alors le comportement du système à différentes échéances à partir d’un état initial préalablement définit.
https://www.meteocontact.fr/pour-aller-plus-loin/les-modeles...
"refaire tourner"
... Estimation des incertitudes et possibilité de refaire tourner le modèle en perturbant les conditions initiales dans les zones sensibles pour
la situation considérée...
https://www.umr-cnrm.fr/IMG/pdf/game_valorisation_v2.pdf
ainsi que dans
... il n ́était pas possible pour les impacteurs de reformuler
leurs modèles pour mieux tenir compte des limites et des caracté́ristiques des sorties des MCGs ou pour les climatologues de refaire tourner les simulations de changement climatique...
http://www.gip-ecofor.org/doc/drupal/gicc/1-00PolcherRF.pdf
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 10 Tage (2021-08-22 09:06:22 GMT) Post-grading
--------------------------------------------------
Bonjour Séverine. Merci d'avoir choisi cette réponse. Puis-je savoir la raison pourquoi vous lui accordez 2 points sur 4 seulement ? Y avait-il des éléments qui vous ont manqué...?
Note from asker:
| En effet refaire tourner semble utilisé au sein de la communauté scientifique de météorologie. Merci. |
2 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
16 hrs
Francois Boye
United States
United States
Native in French
United States
An economic geek with social skills
Native in: French 
Works in: English to French, French to English, Spanish to English, and 1 more.
English term (edited):
to make reruns
d'accomplir de nouvelles simulations d'inondations
Meteorologists build models of the weather. The reruns are about simulating floods that did not happen. The point is to explore events that did not happen but could have happened.
-1
1 hr
English term (edited):
reruns of flood events
comparer les (prédictions des) simulations avec des inondations réelles du passé
What you forgot to mention is that this MUST BE about about some simulation / forecasting software.
"reruns of flood events" = run the "model" (= predictions about how some events will unfold from a given initial state of the system) taking as "initial point of the simulation" the situation just before some past real flooding, and compare the predictions according to this model / simulation with how past real flood events did evolve for real.
If the "predictive model" is any good, starting from some some real life "initial state of the system" it SHOULD predict how the system did evolve for real / the "predictions from the model" should correspond to what really happened.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2021-08-11 11:55:41 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
asked if the Centre had been able to make some reruns of flood events in the last couple of years
=
... si le Centre a été en mesure de comparer les (prédictions des) simulations avec des inondations réelles du passé
it's a "re-run" because it's an attempt to "run again" some past flood event using this model / simulation software.
The first "run" is the real past event, the "repeated run" is the software simulation of that past event.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2021-08-11 13:20:15 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
OK
so it would then be
comparer les (prédictions des) simulations modifiées avec des inondations réelles du passé
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2021-08-11 13:25:11 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
IOW you keep tweaking various parameters and see if the "model's predictions" are getting better.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 days 23 hrs (2021-08-14 09:35:57 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
in this specific sentence
"... make some reruns of flood events in the last couple of years"
is DEFINITELY about
"comparing real flood events that happened in the last couple of years - how this flood events unfolded - with what should have happened ed according to the model / the simulation"
It is quite possible that if one set of parameters "predicted" a course of event that didn't correspond to what had really happened, the simulation was rerun with different parameters again and again, until the "simulated version of events" started resembling was really happened.
IOW whether it was done once or repeatedly, the key point is STILL in
comparer les (prédictions des) simulations avec des inondations réelles du passé.
"reruns of flood events" = run the "model" (= predictions about how some events will unfold from a given initial state of the system) taking as "initial point of the simulation" the situation just before some past real flooding, and compare the predictions according to this model / simulation with how past real flood events did evolve for real.
If the "predictive model" is any good, starting from some some real life "initial state of the system" it SHOULD predict how the system did evolve for real / the "predictions from the model" should correspond to what really happened.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2021-08-11 11:55:41 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
asked if the Centre had been able to make some reruns of flood events in the last couple of years
=
... si le Centre a été en mesure de comparer les (prédictions des) simulations avec des inondations réelles du passé
it's a "re-run" because it's an attempt to "run again" some past flood event using this model / simulation software.
The first "run" is the real past event, the "repeated run" is the software simulation of that past event.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2021-08-11 13:20:15 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
OK
so it would then be
comparer les (prédictions des) simulations modifiées avec des inondations réelles du passé
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2021-08-11 13:25:11 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
IOW you keep tweaking various parameters and see if the "model's predictions" are getting better.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 days 23 hrs (2021-08-14 09:35:57 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
in this specific sentence
"... make some reruns of flood events in the last couple of years"
is DEFINITELY about
"comparing real flood events that happened in the last couple of years - how this flood events unfolded - with what should have happened ed according to the model / the simulation"
It is quite possible that if one set of parameters "predicted" a course of event that didn't correspond to what had really happened, the simulation was rerun with different parameters again and again, until the "simulated version of events" started resembling was really happened.
IOW whether it was done once or repeatedly, the key point is STILL in
comparer les (prédictions des) simulations avec des inondations réelles du passé.
Note from asker:
| Thanks for your answer. The client finally got back to me with this answer: It certainly involves rerun a model (this is what we use to make a forecast). But the idea is to run a different version of the model where something has changed, and compare the forecast produced by this different version of the model with the actual observations and see if this new version is better than the original one. |
Peer comment(s):
| disagree |
GILLES MEUNIER
: inondations réelles du passé = antérieures ou précédentes
18 hrs
|
|
Monsieur de la Palisse ne dirait pas mieux !
|
Something went wrong...