Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Russian term or phrase:
При изменении законодательства
English translation:
In case of change in the laws of....
Russian term
При изменении законодательства
– при изменении законодательства РФ в части, затрагивающей права, обязанности иинтересы...
Non-PRO (1): TechLawDC
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
In case of change in the laws of....
If there is a legislative amendment
whenever the law/legislation is changed
"They are made available for updates whenever the Law changes."
"When you embed a company policy onto a website, it will automatically be updated by the company whenever the law changes."
"Whenever the law changes, we drop updates into your folder at no extra charge as long as you are within your support period."
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2020-09-21 10:33:51 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
In a dissent, Justice Stevens wrote that the majority had "undervalued the threat to liberty that is posed whenever the criminal law is changed retroactively". (The New York Times)
Something went wrong...