French term
DATE INDICE COURANT
MAÎTRE D’OUVRAGE
RÉDACTEURS
DATE INDICE COURANT
DATE INDICE INITIAL
4 +4 | current issue date | Tony M |
3 | current index date | Juan Arturo Blackmore Zerón |
May 30, 2020 03:07: Yvonne Gallagher changed "Level" from "PRO" to "Non-PRO"
Non-PRO (3): mchd, Jennifer White, Yvonne Gallagher
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
current issue date
'revision' is another option in place of 'issue', but I personally prefer to use the latter, since it is the 'revisions' to the document that provoke its being reissued; it's a bit like 'editions' of a publication, but that term is not generally used for this sort of document — which is specifically intended to be revised, reworked, modified, corrected, and updated, and is expected to go through several 'approval' cycles etc.
I think part of the point is that 'going to the trouble of issuing it all over again' must not be perceived as inhibiting the inclusion of important changes etc.
Something went wrong...