I don't use jive, and am certainly not a jet-setter (and wasn't when that term was popular in the 1960's and 70's). I don't like the implication here, when I simply look things up to see how people discuss these subjects in current usage. For me, it is the usage that changes over time, and I think my job is to make the Swedish as understandable as possible in English to today's readers. Many of these, in this context, will be ESL speakers who don't have the slightest idea what decades old English usage means. Others who I've met -- my age or older -- are also ESL speakers who will give me a wink and say something like "When I studied this, we learned it as 'XXX'" And we can enjoy a little laugh about how usage has changed. And these latter will still understand the current usage, also.

Still, what I say shouldn't affect anybody else's confidence level, since we all seem to be doing well enough in our chosen profession.

That said, I see the Swedish in this question as somewhat sloppy in formulation. This looks like part of the minutes from an AGM (or stockholder's meeting). So context is important. If it is in terms of issuing shares for share-based payment to employees (or board directors), you should use 'share option' for teckningsoptioner. If the company is trying to raise money from investors, then warrants works fine. But like I said, this text alone is not entirely clear.