Spanish term
tamaño residual
they say that the average "tamaño residual" was...
how do you translate this?
4 +3 | residual size | Robert Carter |
Dec 5, 2015 18:54: Charles Davis changed "Level" from "PRO" to "Non-PRO"
Non-PRO (3): Joseph Tein, Robert Carter, Charles Davis
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
residual size
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 12 mins (2015-12-05 18:46:50 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Not being facetious, but what else did you think it could mean?
Debulking clearly means reducing the size of the tumor, so what's left is the residual size.
Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't see how else it could be construed.
Radiologic workup or prior abdominal exploration must show abnormalities consistent with disease which can be debulked to a residual size of less than 1 cm in diameter per tumor deposit in the judgement of the investigators.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00052962
http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/26/1/83.full
http://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/323625
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00052962
neutral |
Joseph Tein
: The answer to this is obvious and I agree with your comment ... I can't see why ask the question.
14 mins
|
I'm puzzled too, but I have to admit that sometimes I need someone to tell me that the obvious answer is the right one.
|
|
agree |
Charles Davis
: Well done for taking the question seriously, with good refs (and of course for being right).
19 mins
|
You never know where the person's thought process might have taken them, we all get drawn into screwy logic from time to time, though I'd be hard pressed lumping you among "all of us" :-), thanks, Charles.
|
|
agree |
María Perales
38 mins
|
Thank you, María
|
|
agree |
Muriel Vasconcellos
12 hrs
|
Thank you, Muriel
|
Discussion
what makes it a "Pro" level question for you?