Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term
resp.
The beakers are made of high-density Polyethylene (PE-HD) resp. Polypropylene (PP).
What does resp. stand for? The "root" source language could be German (i.e. this resp. could be an English translation of a German word).
I also found in the web: resp. formaldehyde.
Thanks in advance!
4 +4 | respectively | Tony M |
Jan 11, 2014 11:03: Marga Shaw changed "Level" from "PRO" to "Non-PRO"
Jan 13, 2014 07:43: Tony M Created KOG entry
Jan 13, 2014 07:44: Tony M changed "Field" from "Tech/Engineering" to "Other" , "Field (specific)" from "Chemistry; Chem Sci/Eng" to "General / Conversation / Greetings / Letters" , "Field (write-in)" from "Plastics" to "found in document about Plastics"
Non-PRO (3): Tony M, Virginie Mair, Marga Shaw
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Responses
respectively
Here, it probably means they may be made of either... or... — the use of 'respectively' only applies if Beaker A and Beaker B have been specifically mentioned, and one is made of PP while the other is PP.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 23 minutes (2014-01-11 08:20:06 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
By the way, this has come up several times before, I believe, and ought to be findable in the glossary.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 23 heures (2014-01-12 07:49:15 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
No, that's right, Asker: the position in the word order betrays the German origins, as that is the word order that would be used in German.
Your first suggestion is correct, the second version is not normally acceptable in EN grammar. Sometimes, a case may be made for putting 'respectively' in front of the two terms, otherwise it more usually comes at the end — but never in the middle!
But why the word is put in the middle? I guess it should be "PE-HD and PP resp." instead of "PE-HD resp. PP." Is the latter acceptable in English grammar? |
Something went wrong...