The Law being adopted will schedule the draft legislation for termination in regard to transitional provisions.

Схоже с:

Тем более это необходимо для реализации Указа Главы государства «О некоторых мерах по дальнейшему проведению административной реформы» от 29 марта т.г., в соответствии с которым руководители государственных органов вправе сами принимать решения о сокращении штатной численности, а высвободившиеся в результате этого средства использовать для повышения оплаты труда работников государственного органа.

Это очень действенный шаг, формирующий принцип корпоративного управления в работе государственных органов. Только наделив первого руководителя правами самостоятельно определять структуру и численный состав руководимого государственного органа, использования сэкономленных таким образом средств на материальное стимулирование государственных служащих, мы вправе расчитывать на эффективность работы государственного органа и всей системы государственного управления.

При этом, сделав первый шаг в этом направлении, мы должны сделать и второй – поставить на утрату постановление Правительства N 1010 от 6 октября 1998 г., устанавливающий нормативы численности структурных подразделений государственных органов.
(http://www.kyzmet.kz/?id_1=0&type=news&lang=ru&nid=162)


--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 час (2012-07-07 21:36:58 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

I agree that the RUS source language has little sense. IMHO, this is a perfect example of the 'parliamentarian slang': 'поставить на утрату' = 'лишить силы'.

However, my reasoning was:

(a) There is a certain draft legislation that has some transitional provisions;

(b) It is being discussed to be adopted as the Law;

(c) As a result of the discussion, it will be passed w/o the transitional provisions;

(d) However, the transitional provisions have already been enacted by, say, a President's Decree;

(e) So, the Parliament (when adopting the Law) will have to put on its agenda the termination of the already enacted transitional provisions by a separate piece of legislation .

That's how I read it and I would appreciate any other better translation of the process into English.

Unfortunately, I don't have a good acquaintance among members of any parliament to double-check if my understanding is anywhere close to reality after midnight my time :-)

My guess is that the key words here are "override" / "supersede" / "take precedence over," for which the new law established "transition rules."

The Russian is ambiguous, if not nonsensical. The way it is worded, I can see TWO (draft) laws being tabled (in the British usage, that is, as in put ON the table rather than on the back burner =)), with the former, when and if passed, overriding/supersede/taking precedence over the latter, for which purposes it contains some transition rules during which the latter (referred to as “Законопроект” in the source) will be gradually phased out while the former («принимаемый Закон» in the source) becomes fully valid / comes into effect. Which presumes that the latter (“Законопроект”) has already been effective for some time, which doesn’t make much sense.
The question remains, though, how a “Законопроект” can possibly be effective at all before a «принимаемый Закон» (which is apparently a different piece legislation) has been passed, with or without transition rules in it.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 16 hrs (2012-07-08 11:39:29 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Correction: ... for which some "transition rules" are being set in the new law.

The bill will be adopted and integrated into the Statute, with concessions made in the transitional provisions.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day15 hrs (2012-07-09 10:34:48 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Alternative: The bill will be adopted and integrated into the Statute, with (eventual) removal of the transitional provisions.