This question was closed without grading. Reason: Other
May 10, 2012 19:40
12 yrs ago
English Middle (ca.1100-1500) term
saidith
English Middle (ca.1100-1500) to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
Did "saidith" ever exist as a past tense of "to say"?
I'm trying to determine if an author has invented a quote out of whole cloth, or if a quote in a manuscript containing this word could actually be a real quote. The quote (which I'd rather not put in full due to Google) is supposed to be from a legal document from mid-17th-century New England. I know the 1650s are not exactly the time period of this source language field, but this is a question for specialists, who will read the Middle English questions.
All other uses of the past tense of "to say" in this document (the author has, if my hunch is right, basically added an imaginary few sentences to the end of what is a real document) are plain ol' "said," not "saidith," and a search in books.google.com shows, when I look at them, NO uses of "saidith." Something that shows up after a search, from a book from 1740, is actually "said o' th'" when you click the link. Searches on Google proper of "saidith" basically reveal modern people playing with language.
Long intro, I know, but I'm fascinated to know if my suspicions are accurate or not. Thank you so much.
I'm trying to determine if an author has invented a quote out of whole cloth, or if a quote in a manuscript containing this word could actually be a real quote. The quote (which I'd rather not put in full due to Google) is supposed to be from a legal document from mid-17th-century New England. I know the 1650s are not exactly the time period of this source language field, but this is a question for specialists, who will read the Middle English questions.
All other uses of the past tense of "to say" in this document (the author has, if my hunch is right, basically added an imaginary few sentences to the end of what is a real document) are plain ol' "said," not "saidith," and a search in books.google.com shows, when I look at them, NO uses of "saidith." Something that shows up after a search, from a book from 1740, is actually "said o' th'" when you click the link. Searches on Google proper of "saidith" basically reveal modern people playing with language.
Long intro, I know, but I'm fascinated to know if my suspicions are accurate or not. Thank you so much.
Discussion
Interesting analysis here (trial in 1692): http://books.google.fr/books?id=o-O6N2reiXMC&pg=PA77&lpg=PA7...