Apr 30, 2010 07:44
14 yrs ago
Dutch term

die pas met het met de stoel naar boven komen, terug mee

Dutch Other Linguistics grammar
Dear colleagues,

I am grammatically puzzled.

Zolang de gravers beneden zijn, moet deze bedieningspeer binnen hun bereik beneden blijven hangen; de laatste graver neemt die pas met het met de stoel naar boven komen, terug mee.

Is this (the second part) grammatically really (Dutch) Dutch? Should it not be sth like 'de laatste graver neemt die terug mee (pas) als hij met de stoel naar boven komt.'

Thank you in advance for your help!

Discussion

Steven Mertens Apr 30, 2010:
exactly. When you replace "het met de stoel naar boven komen" by for example "opvegen" (just to say something) it might make it clearer
Binnur Tuncel van Pomeren (asker) Apr 30, 2010:
I am happy that it took Dutch also a while to understand it is grammatically correct, but the sentence is rubbish. Here grammatically something is not missing indeed. (First we think, het naar boven komen, then het met de stoel naar boven komen) then the puzzle gets solved.... Oups vixen's answer appeared almost before I published.. So we agree with each other. Thank you all!!!!
vixen Apr 30, 2010:
Grammatically correct, but awkward phrasing The trick is that you need to read "het met de stoel naar boven komen" as one phrase. That means that the sentence could indeed be rephrased as per Steven's answer:
de laatste graver neemt die pas mee terug wanneer (of: op het moment dat) hij met de stoel naar boven komt.

Responses

+3
3 mins
Selected

...

Hi,

Grammatically, this is correct. In fact it says "de laatste graver neemt die terug mee op het ogenblik dat hij met de stoel naar boven komt."

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 26 mins (2010-04-30 08:10:19 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

I would indeed formulate it differently, such as "de laatste graver neemt deze ("de bedieningspeer") terug mee wanneer hij met de stoel naar boven komt."
Note from asker:
Hi Steven, Thank you for your answer. I think my question was formulated a bit wrongly. Grammatically ok, but is it a normal sentence or would you rather make a sentence as you formulated above or like what I said above Should it not be sth like 'de laatste graver neemt die terug mee ('pas als' of 'op het ogenbik dat') hij met de stoel naar boven komt Could you please comment on this too?
Peer comment(s):

agree vixen : It took me a while to see how this sentence could be correct, but you are right. It does seem to be a Flemish text, though.
29 mins
Thans Vixen, the sentence is indeed rubbish and should never be formulated like that, but grammatically, it is perfect :-)
agree Ron Willems : yep!
1 hr
agree Henk Peelen
1 hr
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Thank you Steve and all the other Dutch team for their input."
-1
22 mins

...

this is not correct Dutch (I suppose it's Flemish because of the "terug mee", but still ungrammatical). something is missing.

probably they mean something like this:

de laatste graver neemt die pas mee terug (naar boven) (samen) met het (something's missing here; "team dat" perhaps?) met de stoel naar boven komt.

it says "komen", but because of "samen met HET ..." that verb should have been singular. the sentence is basically rubbish imo, not just because something is missing...

Note from asker:
I am the most grateful for your answer Ron.... I have seen your answer just after I have commented on Steven's remark. Your answer is exactly what was in my mind. I can split the sentence and understand it when I think German but I have never heard a Dutch making such a composition.
Peer comment(s):

disagree Steven Mertens : Hi Ron, it is indeed grammatically correct, but nor a Flemish nor a Dutch would formulate it like that. It only leads to confusion
15 mins
you are completely right - I didn't read it properly. nothing is missing. (but the author of this sentence is not going to win any literature prizes soon...)
neutral vixen : I agree that the sentence is rubbish, but there's nothing missing; see my discussion entry ;-)
22 mins
yep, I was blind but now I see :-)
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search