Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Dutch term or phrase:
ER dragerschap
English translation:
the employer's own risk / self-insurance
Added to glossary by
rafw
Dec 10, 2005 13:36
18 yrs ago
1 viewer *
Dutch term
ER dragerschap
Dutch to English
Bus/Financial
Law (general)
Company regulations
This is in a text for company regulations. This is a section on WAO and WIA:
ER dragerschap met ingang van 29 december afschaffen. Wordt centraal opgezegd door dhr Aaa. Rond dit besluit zal toelichtende communicatie worden opgesteld.
Centraal zullen afspraken gemaakt worden met betrekking tot WIA, waarbij wij adviseren ruime voorzieningen te nemen
ER dragerschap met ingang van 29 december afschaffen. Wordt centraal opgezegd door dhr Aaa. Rond dit besluit zal toelichtende communicatie worden opgesteld.
Centraal zullen afspraken gemaakt worden met betrekking tot WIA, waarbij wij adviseren ruime voorzieningen te nemen
Proposed translations
(English)
| 3 +1 | the employer's own risk / self-insurance |
rafw
|
| 3 | Probably - see below |
Dave Calderhead
|
Proposed translations
+1
3 hrs
Selected
the employer's own risk / self-insurance
For info on "Eigenrisicodragerschap" (employer reintegrating employees,partially/totally unable to work)- "Voor 2006 is de periode van eigenrisicodragerschap vastgesteld op 4 jaar." [see vng-link]
Reference:
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
Kate Hudson (X)
2 mins
|
|
Thanks, you found it as well
|
|
| neutral |
Dave Calderhead
: How does this fit with "ER dragerschap met ingang van 29 december afschaffen"? (:-{(>
8 hrs
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you!
Thanks to everyone for their explanations!"
17 mins
Dave Calderhead
Netherlands
Netherlands
Native in English
Works in field
Netherlands
Reliable translations, reasonable rates
Native in: English
Works in: Dutch to English, English
Related KudoZ points
:
88
Probably - see below
because of the change of the WAO to WIA, on 29 December 2005, companies continue to be responsible for the effort to reintegrate people in suitable jobs.
Currently, companies either have to take out insurance against the risk of paying the costs of sick employees, or carry those risks themselves. Thus, scrapping the own risk responsibility would imply that the company is taking out insurance instead.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 19 mins (2005-12-10 13:55:19 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
The company is making adequate provisions, which could still be own management or placement of an insurance.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 20 mins (2005-12-10 13:56:19 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Probably in my answer refers to Kate's ER question!
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 24 mins (2005-12-10 14:00:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
On better reading of the text this looks like instructions from a holding company, in which subsidiaries are being advised that the holding company is scrapping its support for WAO risks and recommending that the subsidiaries make adequate provisions for the risks.
The provisions could be by way of insurance or, as an alternative, holding reserves to cover costs incurred.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 days 4 hrs 52 mins (2005-12-13 18:29:10 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
yo satisfy RAFW - my answer would be 'own risk responsibility' and in context see scrapping its "support for WAO risks" in the note above
Currently, companies either have to take out insurance against the risk of paying the costs of sick employees, or carry those risks themselves. Thus, scrapping the own risk responsibility would imply that the company is taking out insurance instead.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 19 mins (2005-12-10 13:55:19 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
The company is making adequate provisions, which could still be own management or placement of an insurance.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 20 mins (2005-12-10 13:56:19 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Probably in my answer refers to Kate's ER question!
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 24 mins (2005-12-10 14:00:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
On better reading of the text this looks like instructions from a holding company, in which subsidiaries are being advised that the holding company is scrapping its support for WAO risks and recommending that the subsidiaries make adequate provisions for the risks.
The provisions could be by way of insurance or, as an alternative, holding reserves to cover costs incurred.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 days 4 hrs 52 mins (2005-12-13 18:29:10 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
yo satisfy RAFW - my answer would be 'own risk responsibility' and in context see scrapping its "support for WAO risks" in the note above
Peer comment(s):
| neutral |
rafw
: In fact, what do you propose as translation: do we have to look for it in your explanation ?
3 days 4 hrs
|
Discussion